Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ken Finlayson's avatar

Not only a "retraction " is required. There must be accountability for such actions!

This is unabashed malicious libel (on a global scale) which indicted an entire nation and religion which precipitated the burning and destruction of some 70 churches. Most of which are not even being investigated.

The PM himself passively implied condoneing the arson. Imagine the responce if 70 some Mosques, Temples or Synagogues had been targeted by arson. A " retraction" falls far short of what is required!

Expand full comment
alfie's avatar

thank you

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts